
Updated September 2026.
This page is a living community resource for following the 39° North / Kings Beach Town Center redevelopment — what is proposed now, how the project has changed, what public decisions have already been made, what remains under review, and where to find the underlying record.
39° North has evolved repeatedly. Earlier Strong North Tahoe posts and emails are preserved below as dated snapshots of what we knew, what was being presented, and what questions neighbors were asking at the time. Where later source review has clarified or corrected an earlier figure, this page uses the newer record and notes the difference.
Current Status — September 2026
September 22: 39° North Returns to Tahoe Basin Design Review
Tuesday, September 22, 2026 · 4:00 p.m.
North Tahoe Event Center · 8318 N. Lake Boulevard, Kings Beach
39° North returns to the Tahoe Basin Design Review Committee for review of revised plans following the Committee’s February discussion.
The proposal spans two separate sites in Kings Beach. The Kings Beach Center site includes a 132-room hotel and commercial uses, along with 38 market-rate townhomes intended to operate as condo-hotel units. The Eastern Gateway site contains the proposed deed-restricted “achievable” housing.
This is design review, not final project approval. Additional County and TRPA review and entitlement decisions remain ahead.
There are also several differences among the current public materials that we are tracking rather than silently reconciling. The revised September plans reviewed by Strong North Tahoe show 51 achievable housing units, while the County’s main 39° North webpage still lists 64. The current architectural plans and County materials also use different figures for the hotel’s building length and commercial floor area.
Those differences — along with Salmon Avenue operations, public spaces and the basis for the remaining building-length variance — are among the questions going into the September 22 review.
Placer County 39° North Project Page
Tahoe Basin Design Review Committee Agendas & Materials
What We’re Looking At Now
You Asked About 39° North — Here’s What Stood Out Before Tuesday
After neighbors responded to the newly released plans with questions, we went back through the February design review and the September materials for a closer look.
Five issues stood out: the redesigned achievable housing, everything being asked of Salmon Avenue, which public spaces are actually part of the current design-review recommendation, differing commercial-space figures, and the remaining hotel-length variance.
Read: You Asked About 39° North — Here’s What Stood Out Before Tuesday
39° North Returns to Design Review September 22
Our earlier September update provides the meeting information, a first look at the revised plans and links to the materials released for the hearing.
Read: Save the Date — 39° North Returns to Design Review Sept. 22
Why We’re Following This Project
Strong North Tahoe sees value in thoughtful redevelopment and understands why Placer County created tools to help difficult Tahoe redevelopment projects move forward.
When public land, scarce development rights and long-term public incentives are part of that effort, we also want to understand the other side of the equation: what commitments are secured, what safeguards remain in place, what value is being delivered to the community, and how the final project aligns with the plans and expectations that have shaped the Kings Beach Town Center.
Our goal with this page is to make that record easier for neighbors to follow for themselves.
Latest Strong North Tahoe Reporting
September 2026 — From Yosemite to Tahoe, Making Development Work Is Only Half the Question
Recent reporting involving another Kingsbarn-controlled development near Yosemite raised a broader question about the role public decisions can play in making difficult development possible. The Yosemite and Kings Beach projects are separate, with different land, agencies and approval processes. This piece follows those distinctions while looking at the public actions that have accumulated around redevelopment in Kings Beach.
Read: From Yosemite to Tahoe, Making Development Work Is Only Half the Question
March 8, 2026 — Testing the Fit: What the 39° North Design Review Revealed
A detailed look at the February Tahoe Basin Design Review Committee meeting: building length and scale, pedestrian experience, housing, public spaces, parking, circulation and how the proposal was being evaluated against the Kings Beach Town Center framework.
Read: Testing the Fit — What the 39° North Design Review Revealed
February 16, 2026 — 39° North at NTRAC: What Was Raised
What neighbors, NTRAC members, County staff and the applicant discussed at the February 12 meeting — including scale, housing, parking, infrastructure, wildfire and evacuation, environmental review and the next steps then ahead.
Read: 39° North at NTRAC — What Was Raised
Follow the Project From the Beginning
Years in the Making: The 39° North / Kings Beach Town Center Timeline
The current proposal sits inside a much longer story involving redevelopment planning, public land, property transactions, developer changes, planning rules, environmental review, incentives and repeated project revisions.
Our timeline follows that history from the earlier Kings Beach redevelopment effort through the project now known as 39° North.
Explore the 39° North / Kings Beach Town Center Timeline
For the County’s own property and agreement history:
Placer County — Kings Beach Center & Eastern Gateway Properties
Public Incentives — What Was Authorized in June 2025?
The 39° North incentive request is part of Placer County’s North Lake Tahoe Economic Development Incentive Program, created to help spur environmental and economic development and redevelopment in the Tahoe Basin.
On June 24, 2025, the Board of Supervisors voted 5–0 to authorize the County Executive Officer or designee to execute an option agreement with KB Kings Beach LLC / Kingsbarn.
The proposed incentive structure included an option involving 106 Tourist Accommodation Units (TAUs) and an 80% rebate of project-generated Transient Occupancy Tax for 20 years. County staff estimated the possible 20-year TOT rebate at approximately $22.9 million to $30.9 million, depending on the amount of TOT actually generated.
The stage distinction matters. County staff stated that, other than the $1 option price, the financial terms would begin only if the project were approved and the option exercised. The actual TAU transfer was contemplated as a separate future Board action. The County later described the option as a placeholder for the 106 TAUs while the project continued through its required approvals.
The County had 146 TAUs in its incentive-program bank at the time. The 39° North option concerned 106 of them, leaving 40 available in the bank.
The Same Day: evo Hotel
39° North was not the only North Lake Tahoe incentive action before the Board that day. The Board also approved an incentive package for the existing evo Hotel in Tahoe City, including an 80% rebate of incremental TOT for nine years.
The projects and their circumstances are different, but the two actions provide useful context for how the County’s incentive program is being used.
Strong North Tahoe can see merit in incentives that help redevelopment happen. Our continuing question is whether incentives of significant scale and duration are paired with equally clear commitments and safeguards so the community can understand what is being secured in return.
Primary Sources — June 2025 Incentive Action
- 39° North — June 24, 2025 Item 13A Staff Report & Proposed Option Agreement
- 39° North — June 9, 2025 NTEDIP Application & On-File Supporting Materials
- June 24, 2025 Approved Board of Supervisors Minutes
- Placer County Recap — 39° North & evo Incentive Actions
- North Lake Tahoe Economic Development Incentive Program
Digging Into the Public Record
July 9, 2025 — Was the 2018 Kings Beach Deal Done Right?
A community-led examination of the original Kings Beach Center transaction, the records we had located by July 2025 and the questions that emerged as we began reconstructing how the deal developed.
Read: Was the 2018 Kings Beach Deal Done Right?
July 3, 2025 — The Truth We Deserve: What I Uncovered About 39° North
The beginning of a deeper effort to reconstruct the project from original documents rather than looking only at the proposal then in front of the community.
Read: The Truth We Deserve — What I Uncovered About 39° North
June 25, 2025 — Board Recap: A Turning Point for 39° North and Kings Beach
Our immediate recap following the June 24 incentive hearing and vote.
Source update: This original recap described 146 TAUs as being reserved. Our later source review clarified that the option concerned 106 TAUs; 146 was the number then held in the County’s incentive-program bank. The current page uses the corrected figure.
2025 Community Record
These posts preserve Strong North Tahoe’s questions, public comments and community work as the project and available record evolved in 2025. They should be read in the context of their publication dates. Where later research has clarified an earlier fact, the current-status and primary-source sections above should control.
June 23, 2025 — Public Comment Tool & Meeting Prep
39° North Incentive Vote — Public Comment Builder & Letter
June 22, 2025 — Our Letter on the Incentive Request
Our Letter to Placer County — 39° North June 2025 Incentive Request
June 20, 2025 — Kings Beach Center Agreement & Milestones
Our Letter to Placer County — Kings Beach Center Agreement & Project Direction
June 14, 2025 — Why We Asked the County to Wait
June 13, 2025 — Public Land, Public Money, Public Trust
Public Land, Public Money, Public Trust
June 7, 2025 — Kingsbarn Developer Meeting Recap
Kingsbarn Developer Meeting Recap: What Changed & What Didn’t
May 28, 2025 — 39° North Is Evolving
39° North Is Evolving — It’s Time to Involve the Community
39° North Email Update Archive
Our email updates are also part of the project record. They capture what was happening at particular moments — upcoming meetings, newly released information, questions neighbors were asking and what we understood from the record at the time.
Because both the project and our research have continued to evolve, these should be read as dated contemporaneous updates, not as substitutes for the current-status and primary-source sections above.
2026 Updates
- You Asked About 39° North — Here’s What Stood Out Before Tuesday
- Save the Date — 39° North Returns to Design Review Sept. 22
- 39° North: Key Milestone Approaching for Kings Beach Town Center
- 39° North — The County Review Starts Feb. 12
- February 12: 39° North — More Than a Design Update
- 39° North at NTRAC: What Was Raised & What Happens Feb. 24
- Why Tuesday’s 39° North Meeting Matters
Selected 2025 Updates
- Was the 2018 Kings Beach Deal Done Right?
- What You Might Not Know About 39° North — Until Now
- June 24 Board Recap: A Turning Point for 39° North and Kings Beach
- New Resource: Build Your Comment on 39° North
- Not Yet for 39° North — Let’s Follow the Process
- 39° North Developer Meeting Recap — What Changed, What Didn’t
- June Meetup Recap — Speak Thursday & Join the 39° North Group
Official Project & Public Record Links
- Placer County — Current 39° North Project Page
- Tahoe Basin Design Review Committee — Agendas & Materials
- Placer County — Kings Beach Center & Eastern Gateway Property History & Agreements
- North Lake Tahoe Economic Development Incentive Program
- June 24, 2025 — 39° North Incentive Staff Report & Option Agreement
- June 9, 2025 — Kingsbarn NTEDIP Application & Supporting Materials
- June 24, 2025 — Approved Board of Supervisors Minutes
Stay Involved
You do not need to know every agreement, plan or project number to participate. If there is a part of Kings Beach you know well — housing, parking, walking, local business, snow operations, public spaces, transportation or simply how the town works day to day — that perspective matters.
Read the Latest Strong North Tahoe Updates
Join the 39° North Action Group
Have a question or see a record we should add? Send it our way. This page will continue to be updated as the project moves through review.

